Why Are You Ashamed Of The PM?: Court Asks Petitioner
Examining a plea seeking removal of PM Modi's photograph from the COVID-19 vaccination certificate, the Kerala High Court today asked the petitioner whether he was ashamed of the PM.
A senior citizen, Peter Myaliparampil had filed a case in the Kerala High Court stating that he had paid for 2 doses of the vaccine, then why was the PM's photo on his vaccination certificate. It was his private space and the PM's photo was a violation of fundamental rights. While listening to the plea seeking removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's photograph from the COVID-19 vaccination certificate, the Kerala High Court today asked the petitioner whether he was ashamed of the PM. Justice PV Kunhikrishnan said the Prime Minister was elected to power by the people of the country and therefore, what was wrong with having his photograph on the vaccination certificate. When the petitioner's lawyer told the court that in other countries there was no such practice, Justice PV Kunhikrishnan orally remarked, "They may not be proud of their PMs, we are proud of our PM." "Why are you ashamed of the Prime Minister? He came to power through the mandate of the people. We may have different political views, but he is still our PM," the court further said.
The lawyer for the petitioner said that the certificate was a "private space" with personal details on record and therefore, it was inappropriate to intrude into the privacy of an individual. He contended that adding the PM's photo to the certificate was an intrusion into an individual's private space. To this the court said that the more than 100 crore people of the country do not appear to have a problem with having the PM's photo on the vaccine certificate, "why do you?" Advocate Ajit Joy, appearing for the complainant, said that whether to be proud of one's PM was a personal choice. Mr Joy also told the court that it was not a matter of political differences, as the Supreme Court has laid down guidelines for advertisements and campaigns using public money. He said having the photo on the certificates would also influence the minds of voters. The central government opposed the plea saying it was a publicity interest litigation. The court said it will examine whether the plea has any merits and if not, it will dispose of the matter.
